Added 1/22/07 -
It’s done(-ish)! It’s up! 640 bloggers’ top ten album lists, 1421 CDs, ranked n’ bassed for your amusement. Head to the
main page for the meat; continue below for indulgent blather and cursory comparisons.
*
I’ve been suffering great bouts of gastrointestinal distress, lately, and the situation’s escalated from embarrassing and uncomfortable to life-threatening. An ex-girlfriend with whom I’ve remained friendly was in town this past weekend; there was low-grade body oil, and candles, and... Listen, all I’m saying is that when you get a racy tattoo in a delicate place thinking no one will see it who isn’t meant to, you might consider the possibility an emergency skin graft could slap that thing right across your forehead. That’s all I’m saying.
Too much information.
A very bloggy sort of problem, that, and one with which I’ve been wrestling the past couple months. When I initially posted this year’s Bloggregate, just before Christmas, I’d maxed out an Excel spreadsheet with the info already collected (“That’s Microsoft’s way of saying, ‘Build a real database,’” someone told me). Then, I had 249 sources... And while I couldn’t use many of the examples linked on Largehearted Boy’s
massive throbbing collection of Year-End Music Lists, a combination of those I could use and others e-mailed my way or found through searches brought me beyond the 640 currently included.
That final number is almost 500 lists larger than
last year’s Bloggregate. It’s larger than Idolator’s first
Jackin’ Pop survey, and they had, like, paid helpers and tech people and interns and stuff. I had me and an abacus and a lot of Diet Dr. Pepper. It’s smaller than the 2005 edition of the
Voice’s
Pazz/Jop poll – that had 795 participants (the 2006 edition is due next month), but I could have dwarfed that had I wanted. Because there is so much information – On the Internet? Who knew? – you could keep compiling lists until people started making next years’ lists.
In the end, I just ran out of space and time and sanity.
Those are pretty good parameters, come to think of it.
*
Results? You want results? Jeez.
All right. Here’s your final Top 30:
And a side-by-side comparison with the old (12/21) Top 30:
I’m not going to delve into the results too deeply – as I’ve noted before, I don’t find the consensus that important – but with some notable exceptions, the additional 400 lists mostly led to a little shuffling and a longer tail. The Top 30 is a little less white-white-white:
Ghostface jumped from #46 to 23,
Clipse from #53 to 28.
The Roots had the highest ranked hip-hop album before (#43); now, they’ve got the third-highest ranked (and are still at #43). Nine of the top ten from December’s survey remain in the top ten; the top three are exactly the same – though at one point The Hold Steady were barking at Newsom’s ankles. Nasally.
Here’s a side-by-side-by-side comparison with Jalopfensnork and the sizable-enough
Indie for Bunnies blogger poll. The titles in blue didn’t appear in the Bloggregate Top 30 (their ranking is noted in parenthesis).
Obviously the Schnookfenbrackers went heavier on the rap, for whatever reason; not only are Ghostface and Clipse in the top four, but four additional hip-hop acts made their top thirty. They also broke both older and artsier (Waits, Walker, Sonic Youth) and younger and dancier (Timberlake, Girl Talk).
But the two lists shared 21 of their top 31 records (Brahrahgrah having a tie for the #30 spot, CrackerJism putting Lily Allen at #31). The Bunnies poll, predictably, had even more overlap.
Further comparison between Bwanganana and Josiepoop:
- Idolator: TVotR got 125 mentions from its 497 ballots, better than 25%; here we got 151 mentions from 640 lists, just under 24%.
- Jerknsquat voters nominated 1300 titles (a suspiciously round number, but whatever); the Gluggluggrape contains 1421 different CDs
- Bloggregate: 854 titles (60% of all mentioned) only received a single vote; my own list accounts for two of those. It looks like exactly 800 CDs (61.5%) in the Idolator poll got one vote each.
- Both polls have stupid names.
*
One big difference is context.
I really wish the
Voice and Idolator would give us some clue as to who their voters are. A link, or a bio snippet, or at least a primary publication. Pazz/Jop
promises “the brightest minds in music journalism” (biting... tongue...). Idolator
boldly mumbled that their poll was “open primarily to people who regularly write about music”... which I read as: “We’ll take anyone willing to force at least two adverbs into every sentence" (and later became "anyone whose ballot doesn’t get swallowed by their spam filter”). A step in the right direction but, still, who are those people? I’m not Googling all that shit. Are they implying everyone should look at those lists of names and just
know, man? That’s the sort of insularity that makes music critics so off-putting in the first place. Or are they implying that we shouldn’t care?
*
(And FWIW, I did include the ballots of Idolator eds
Johnston and
Raftery here; it’s awful nice Denton allowed them to put their names on something.)
*
A couple other quick snaps before I get to work at dreading next year (when this will all be done differently, either by me or someone who actually knows how to use a computer...).
Here are your top first-place vote-getters:
And, finally, I took the titles in the top ten percent and re-ranked them according to average vote (1 being highest, 10 lowest).
Coming out on top were The Veils; I’d already snatched that one up thanks to
these folks. Listen to those folks. They know of what they rave.
*
*
From 12/21/06 -